Friday, July 10, 2009

U.S.A: A society of experiment!

I was recently watching the "The century of self", a B.B.C documentary. The documentary shows the various cultural transformation which were pushed and influenced by some major psychologists/psychoanlaysts.

Some highlights of the documentary:

Phase A:

  • Invention of public relations. Invention of Advertisement, appealing to the irrational self of a consumer (Sigmund Freud: human behavior is guided by unconscious sexual and aggressive drives). However, this approach failed after recession. (due to over production)
  • Paradox of making people choose (the elite want people to have a rational choice which is better for all) and still making it look like democracy. (so ultimately manipulating the choice of consumers)

Phase B:
  • Free society by liberating the consumer, over feeding the desire.
  • Lifestyle marketing.
  • Self actualization. (Focus groups vs psychological market research)
So , the open question is "if people are irrational", building a feedback mechanism as in ideal democracy will make irrational decisions. Do we need a leadership which takes the vision of people beyond their own selfish needs or they must just cater to their short term demands.

Thursday, July 09, 2009

Innovation for telecom operators (service store)

I was discussing with a friend about possibilities for mobile operators. (apart from being bit pipes do they really have a case for doing something else in future)

There were main points which we thought a mobile operator is different.

1. For users to experience a service through a mobile, operator can get a lot of first hand data and a better sense to customize and improve the service.

2. Paying for a flat Internet connection like 15 Euros per month in Finland and similar amount elsewhere. Is there still some latent demand which might be satisfied if the price to be paid was less.

As the discussion progressed I came to the conclusion that a new type of business model is possible for mobile operators. which is somewhere in middle of Flat rate and Pre-Paid (or pay as you use)

The proposal is to charge user per service. Say, you are an avid facebook user, the mobile operator will provide you a widget or some other access point in your mobile by which you can access facebook unlimited! (The price is definitely lower then flat rate and pre-paid)

So, as a user if you are not an explorer on Internet and consumer of 2-3 standard Internet services. You might go with this kind of an offer, where an operator can charge you something like: 2 Euros per month for facebook and 3 Euros per month for Youtube (maybe higher because of video content). So, if you are only doing facebook and youtube. You end up paying just 7 euros per month.

From the operator vision, they can create a service store from where people can buy such service pakage for 1-3 Euro each (price depends on the market, this is say as per scandinavia). Like the developer community on other platforms (iPhone, Facebook) , here we have the third parties (Google, Yahoo or a freelancer etc) who can provide there customized widgets on mobile operators service store. There can be a revenue sharing between third party and mobile operator.

Also, Operator can build a colloborative filtering support in the platform and provide standard API's to the service developers and provide users of the service a unique experience customized as per their local network.

This business model would be an equivalent of micro payments in other platforms. Where you (as a user) can buy less demanding services for unlimited use at a much cheaper price. (say even 10 cents, which might be just a weather update from Internet )

It is also combining the bandwidth cost and application cost in one package. (Like amazon kindle where you don't pay for the bandwidth , most customers don't even realize that)

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

New Google Chrome OS

It was just few months back , when I was complaining to my friends in Otaniemi. That why don't we have a device which just boots in a web browser.

I don't remember when was it last time I felt I need any other software on my laptop. (Mostly Mozilla, also some ocassional use of VLC and Open Office)


Now we have today the announcement of Google ChromeOS coming from Google. I don't know will google OS boots up directly into browser on a netbook or any other gadget. But, atleast there might be a chance!

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Future of social media and how it effects India

Out of many value propositions which I could/(or could not) think for social media, one which has just struck me is "Reputation and Trust management".

In the ideal world of high Internet penetration, where every body is on some sort of social networking site. We will have every body connected to somebody (with some exceptions). The creation and identification of trust from reputation would be much easy, especially in the places where it is not that easy now!

Like we already can see role of recommendations on LinkedIn for getting a job. Recommendations do exist in real world but hard or costly to have. In online networks they exist in black and white, easy to access and persists for ever!

Some of the things we (Govt.) ought to do in physical world, where people intend to do some fraud for greedy reasons, like what is mentioned here in an article of Times of India. These problems could be solved effectively with use of online social networks and crowdsourcing.

I am taking some basic assumptions about India here:

1. Coming from India, I know that we have a society where most of the people know about people around them, which is very different from west! So, it is very easy for people to vouch for others (their near and dear ones).

2. Too many people, lot of contribution possible. Success rate for crowdsourcing the effort!

Now one of the problem posed in the article is that govt. want to issue id cards and then they are issued to people who do not even exist and execution fails.

So, what I propose is a wikipedia kind of solution where people can create people database. Let's call it peoplepedia.

Allowed functions for peoplepedia.

1. Creating a node, which is essentially a living person (say in India ) which can be later dead and the status change can happen accordingly.

  • Node will contains the name.
  • The gender.
  • System will issue a unique id to every node.
  • Anybody can create/ delete a node.
  • The system will have a CAPTCHA like solution to prevent non-computers to make fake nodes.
2. Linking to another node, if one thinks they know each other.
  • People can also indicate the relationship when linking. Like relative, friend, NGO, third party etc.
3. Bootstraping this database from existing social networks like Facebook and Orkut. (as chances of having real living users on those networks are high)

4. To users people have a graphical interface to search people based on their unique id, name or social graph neighbors.

5. Optional could be users adding more details to a node which could be private data like passport number etc but then which might need a login/password protection. Although this is not the real value of this database.

6. Since it is a people driven project and people identify the people they know in real life , which gives the trust in the numbers. Also, more people linking to a person will add to the reputation of a person and database can have an indicator based on who links to the node and how many links to the node. Let's call this indicator lively index, which would mean, the chances that person is real and exists/existed in this world ! However, the loss of privacy will happen in form of identifying somebodies social network but since we do not have any other details about that person (apart from name and sex) the privacy loss is minimum.

The cost of the project must not be high but the value it can provide with a small percentage of population actively involved would be high.

It would be a dynamic snapshot of number of real people in the country and also giving the break up (like men and women)

This platform can then be used for vouching for people, for distributing cards / other goods. Although it would not be highly reliable but could boost the confidence of identifying the real person.

I welcome readers of this post to improve the concept as it is in very initial stage and I have the feeling that it can be improved a lot!

Friday, June 19, 2009

Research Questions

Recently, I have started focusing on the "cultural impacts on social media". Somewhat related to this, I was reading an essay on " Is there anything good about men?" @ http://denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm . (Although, the essay is 39 pages long but is very good read)


In the essay, the author talks about men and culture. Where, I could find some parallels with some concepts in economics (The concept of Comparative advantage ) I could relate from the essay that men had/have an edge because of comparative advantage over women. (not because they are more intelligent but of the nature of social network they have)


Research question: Among men/women who is more/less vulnerable on social networks because of the nature of their social networks. (large and shallow vs small and intense)

Moreover, I was just wondering that, if concepts of International trade are applied within a nation, where every individual is treated as a nation and a comparative advantage could be computed. So, people choose professions accordingly and increase the overall productivity of a culture or nation. (However that might be the natural course of action for a society)

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

my current research interests about privacy in LBS

Palen Dourish's work in privacy in networked world is something which has really influenced my thesis work. I found his video from LIFT'08. ( I wish i was there in 2008 too!) 



Also, recently I stumbled upon the Google Tech Talk about privacy enhancement technologies for LBS. (using homomorphic encryption)







Sunday, September 28, 2008

Some interesting videos I have seen.

Since I am always watching something. So this list needs to be frequently updated.

Category: Google Tech Talks

1. The paradox of choice: Barry Schwartz.

2. Human computation, Luis Von Ahn , Google talk. (I have also attended updated version of this live at CERN)

3. Second Life .

4. How to break web software.

5. Biofuels: Think Outside The Barrel

6. Reverse engineering techniques to find security bugs: A case study of the ANI

7. Graphing calculator (One of the most amazing videos, I have ever seen!)

8. Crime: The Real Internet Security Problem

9. Neuromarketing

10. Creative processes in Science and Technology

11. Twitter

Category: BBC documentaries

1. An Islamic history of Europe

2. The Story of India: Part 1-6

3.a. Clash of the Worlds (Episode 1 of 3): Mutiny
3.b. Clash of the Worlds (Episode 2 of 3): Sudan
3.c. Clash of the Worlds: Palestine

4. In the footsteps of Alexander the Great

5. BBC Four - The Smell of Paradise

6.a. Politics - The Power of Nightmares, (Part 1/3), “Baby it's Cold Outside“
6.b. Politics - The Power of Nightmares, (Part 2/3), “The Phantom Victory“
6.c. Politics - The Power of Nightmares, (Part 3/3), “The Shadows in the Cave”