Friday, August 07, 2009

Indian money saving habits and micro loans with game theory

Group A: micro Money Lenders

We were having a discussion about market sizing of Indians earning around ~20K ( which is 400 USD per month) and in the age group of 20 -35 and living in urban areas.

The guesstimate was that such people might be around 100 million and from this a simple estimate gives a market size of 40 billion dollars per month. ( I mean the earning potential)

Next thing we were trying to guess was the break up of their salaries. We (disussion group had a similar background at some point in their life) guesstimated that the biggest fraction 30-40% might go in saving. Which still means close to 12 -16 billion USD per month unused cash.

Group B: people who need micro loans

Then on the other end we have people below the poverty line, they might be from anywhere to 300 million to 400 million. Not all of them in city but maybe a significant number. Also, the hypothesis is that these people under bottom of pyramid need access to micro loans which existing systems have failed to provide because of trust, bureaucracy and what not.

Also, taking another guestimate about typical needs of these people....which might be served under 2K INR (40 USD) for most of the business they want to enter (like buying an old rickshaw)


Enabler
Note: the National ID project, India is currently having an ambitious national id project (assuming it is executed with an acceptable accuracy). It offers us a unique opportunity to connect the above two groups for bringing the trust in system.

Game Theory

I am not an expert in this subject area but if I try to simplify the use of it. Which is, two self interested players are trying to win a game by applying some strategies which are definitely guided by certain incentives.

Something similar we can have in the auctions like second price auctions, where honesty is the best policy. It uses ideas from game theory to maximise the auction bids.

Solution : The money wall

People in group A wants to save money ......but won't mind getting some interest (as most of the Indians look for a savings bank account with higher interest rate).

People in group B need money and are often exploited by money lenders by charging them as high as 100 - 200% interest rates. However , this high interest rate mitigates the risk for money lender.

So what we propose is "A money lending wall" which has two facets: (technically which has a look much like an ATM machine but has an auction kind of algorithm running connecting money lenders with money borrowers and uses the national id to bring the trust in the system)

People from group A can come and deposit money and set their bid of interest rates they are looking from market. (game theory concepts)

People from group B, can come and set their bid for amount of interest or extra money they are willing to pay. (game theory concepts)

The system can give out micro loans to people who are willing to offer as much interest as lenders are expecting and which is then definitely dictated by market forces but removes bureaucratic process and gives easy access of money to people who need it. At the same time giving incentive to people who are willing to lend.

This system can be man less totally run on the mathematical models (like Google runs for Ads auction) and charge a service fee from the people who use it for the running fees or any profits which are needed.

There will be two slight improvements needed in it to make it more robust:

1. to reduce the risk the amount one can borrow could be reduced to a small installment (say 2K, the amount of damage a person can make is reduced)
2. defaulters are linked through national id ,which is unique, so one time defaulter cannot lend money again from the system. (however, by paying a fine it must be possible to join the system back and get out from the list of defaulters)

We expect people to frequently lend for this system to be of use to to people. which is I guess the nature of micro loans. You take small but often :)

2 comments:

  1. It would be great if you would put your money in the bank. By doing so, you will be able to keep them safe.

    ReplyDelete
  2. a very nice idea; however are you suggesting that the money-wall makes a one-to-one mapping between a lender and a borrower? in this case, if the borrower fails to make the promised return, or worse, makes a loss, who takes the hit? [note that i'm assuming trust issues are taken care of, and failure of payment is attributed to market risk]

    to reduce risk, two options both requiring overheads, one: to rope in an insurance company, which will sell money-wall premiums to lenders. second: institute a fund manager would collect money from various lenders and hold an auction targeted at individual enterpreneurs of a certain economic background, where borrowers bid for e.g. a certain rate of return over a certain time frame. the role of the fund manager in this sense is not so different from a VC firm, or a mutual fund manager investing in stocks. of course, this requires an overhead because the fund manager would need to be paid a fee.

    btw, i am told that large corporate banks are already getting into the microfinance market; hence you could simply pitch this money wall idea to standard chartered, for instance.

    ReplyDelete